[aida] Code stats - Aida vs. Seaside vs. Iliad
petton.nicolas at gmail.com
Mon Nov 15 11:53:40 CET 2010
Yes, Iliad needs more comments.
Now, we try to always comment classes and methods of the API. See
ILWidget, ILApplication, etc.
Internal stuff are less commented, and I agree there should be more
comments here too, but I think it's less important.
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 11:40 +0100, Friedrich Dominicus a écrit :
> Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek at eranova.si> writes:
> > Dear all,
> > Code statistics extended with several graphs is now available at Google
> > Docs:
> > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Atnb1W9vuq9ndG4wbUpxNXpKQnFZRlFyQXpHclhZa2c&hl=en#gid=1
> > I added graphs of three distributions:
> > - number of methods in classes
> > - class inheritance depth
> > - number of lines in methods
> > Tests and comments section was also added.
> > Aida Seaside Iliad
> > Nr of test methods 67 914 412
> > Avg tests/class 0,5 1 1,6
> > % of commented methods 45% 23% 5%
> > % of commented classes 32% 39% 13%
> > Quite interesting results and again a lot of food for discussion!
> Indeed AIDA and Seaside need more tests and Iliad more comments ;-)
> Now the question is is Iliad so readable that it does not need comments
> I think discussing somethong upon such numbers is not a worthwhile
> undertaking. Too many open questions which may it feasible to "judge"
More information about the Aida