[aida] isNil ifTrue: idiom
j.squeak at cyberhaus.us
Mon Feb 11 17:20:51 CET 2008
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> Janko Mivšek wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Let me first apologize for such an unresponsiveness and a backlog of
>> your posts to be answered. I have all of them blue tagged on my
>> Thunderbird, so they will be answered, sooner or later. Thanks again for
>> your understanding!
> Not a problem. I'm sure we all understand that you are a busy man. And
> we are quite grateful for what you are able to give.
>> isNil ifTrue: instead if ifNil: is used mostly from two reasons:
>> historical and portability.
>> Historical: back in 1996 there was no ifNil: on VW. This came later,
>> first as extensions by some packages and just in recent years as part of
>> core image.
>> Portability: because of ifNil: is probably still not part of all
>> Smalltalks it is just better to avoid it in core Aida.
>> But it is also true that I'm used of old method and that I didn't find
>> yet a compelling reason to change that habit :)
> Ok, sounds reasonable. As one who does not quite go back so far and has
> only used Squeak, I am quite fond of ifNil:, and will continue to do so
> for personal code.
> Like you, I have the habit of using a certain idiom, in my case, ifNil:,
> and before I made effort to do differently, I just wanted to know if
> there was a reason other than personal preference.
> Would you like for any code written for AIDA and all of its composite
> libraries to use the isNil ifTrue:? If so, then it would be good to add
> this to the coding convention page.
I just changed the coding-conventions page, reworded a few things and
added this convention.
Let me know if you prefer something different.
More information about the Aida